+1 123-456-7890



7


0

YouTube Video VVVURXBJZWliOTJUdUtvMmNTczR3ZzhBLjFYTDVzMmU3OHBr



Anthropic lead admits AI could kill everyone


The AI Risk Network | AI Safety


September 21, 2026 10:15 am



7


0

YouTube Video VVVURXBJZWliOTJUdUtvMmNTczR3ZzhBLnF5YWNPY0FPLUxV



Why AI capabilities are accelerating uncontrollably


The AI Risk Network | AI Safety


September 20, 2026 2:45 pm


AI agents breaking rules, hiding mistakes, and finding unexpected ways to complete their tasks: what happens when getting a high score matters more than following human instructions? In Warning Shots #59, John Sherman, Liron Shapira of Doom Debates, and Michael of Lethal Intelligence discuss the latest AI risk headlines—and whether growing concern is translating into meaningful action. The conversation covers calls to slow the AI race, John’s experience at an event featuring Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon, and the growing public debate over AI extinction risk. We also examine claims about Google and recursive self-improvement, discuss six reported OpenAI safety incidents, and debate AI surveillance, privacy, and who gets to control these systems. In this episode: • AI leaders’ safety proposals—and why pacing is different from pausing • Bernie Sanders, Steve Bannon, and political common ground on AI • AI risk entering mainstream media • What an AI “harness” is and how it relates to self-improvement • Deception, fabricated sources, and agents leaving instructions for future agents • The disagreement over surveillance and predictive policing • Claims that AI safety advocacy is a “psyop” • King Charles and the discussion about AI’s future CHAPTERS 00:00 Welcome to Warning Shots #59 01:26 AI leaders: slowing down or stopping? 08:38 Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon on AI 12:26 Tech power and AI risk in mainstream media 16:53 Did Google crack recursive self-improvement? 19:28 What is an AI harness? 22:53 Six reported OpenAI safety incidents 27:35 When the score matters more than the rules 29:15 AI surveillance and “pre-crime” 32:50 Should every public space be recorded? 38:18 Is AI safety a “psyop”? 43:08 King Charles and AI risk 45:18 Closing thoughts Warning Shots brings together three dads running three YouTube channels to discuss AI risk, the week’s headlines, and the future we’re building for our children. Subscribe for weekly conversations about AI safety, superintelligence, and keeping humans in control. Where would you draw the line: stronger oversight, a slower pace, or a pause on frontier AI development? Tell us why in the comments. #AISafety #AIRisk #WarningShots

AI agents breaking rules, hiding mistakes, and finding unexpected ways to complete their tasks: what happens when getting a high score matters more than following human instructions?

In Warning Shots #59, John Sherman, Liron Shapira of Doom Debates, and Michael of Lethal Intelligence discuss the latest AI risk headlines—and whether growing concern is translating into meaningful action.

The conversation covers calls to slow the AI race, John’s experience at an event featuring Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon, and the growing public debate over AI extinction risk.

We also examine claims about Google and recursive self-improvement, discuss six reported OpenAI safety incidents, and debate AI surveillance, privacy, and who gets to control these systems.

In this episode:
• AI leaders’ safety proposals—and why pacing is different from pausing
• Bernie Sanders, Steve Bannon, and political common ground on AI
• AI risk entering mainstream media
• What an AI “harness” is and how it relates to self-improvement
• Deception, fabricated sources, and agents leaving instructions for future agents
• The disagreement over surveillance and predictive policing
• Claims that AI safety advocacy is a “psyop”
• King Charles and the discussion about AI’s future

CHAPTERS
00:00 Welcome to Warning Shots #59
01:26 AI leaders: slowing down or stopping?
08:38 Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon on AI
12:26 Tech power and AI risk in mainstream media
16:53 Did Google crack recursive self-improvement?
19:28 What is an AI harness?
22:53 Six reported OpenAI safety incidents
27:35 When the score matters more than the rules
29:15 AI surveillance and “pre-crime”
32:50 Should every public space be recorded?
38:18 Is AI safety a “psyop”?
43:08 King Charles and AI risk
45:18 Closing thoughts

Warning Shots brings together three dads running three YouTube channels to discuss AI risk, the week’s headlines, and the future we’re building for our children.

Subscribe for weekly conversations about AI safety, superintelligence, and keeping humans in control.

Where would you draw the line: stronger oversight, a slower pace, or a pause on frontier AI development? Tell us why in the comments.

#AISafety #AIRisk #WarningShots


109


51

YouTube Video VVVURXBJZWliOTJUdUtvMmNTczR3ZzhBLnpvR0N5dmo0c2xn



AI Is Learning to Break the Rules. Who’s in Control? | Warning Shots #59


The AI Risk Network | AI Safety


September 20, 2026 2:42 pm



13


2

YouTube Video VVVURXBJZWliOTJUdUtvMmNTczR3ZzhBLkNCUmRSS0MxbUtF



Former Anthropic researcher on national news


The AI Risk Network | AI Safety


September 19, 2026 6:30 pm



10


1

YouTube Video VVVURXBJZWliOTJUdUtvMmNTczR3ZzhBLjlYWGdWczBlQXBz



AI autonomously solves Millennium Math Prize problem


The AI Risk Network | AI Safety


September 18, 2026 12:30 pm



8


1

YouTube Video VVVURXBJZWliOTJUdUtvMmNTczR3ZzhBLnVVVzJjdmFIb1dN



SoftBank CEO predicts 100 trillion AIS


The AI Risk Network | AI Safety


September 17, 2026 5:30 pm



5


0

YouTube Video VVVURXBJZWliOTJUdUtvMmNTczR3ZzhBLlRGcFR4NkUtd2Z3



Would people turn off AI if they could?


The AI Risk Network | AI Safety


September 16, 2026 7:15 pm


Support Guard Rail Now: https://www.every.org/guardrailnow Two days after an Anthropic researcher's resignation post went viral, Axios co-founder Jim VandeHei joins John Sherman to talk about what changed in Washington, and what he says still has not been built. VandeHei explains why he doubts this week's burst of congressional attention turns into real legislation, describes the independent review board and "kill switch" he thinks the industry still lacks, and tells John why his own odds of AI causing serious harm are lower than his host's. They also get into VandeHei's new book "Simplify," what AI has done for his family, AI in schools, and a moment from an advertising industry panel where nearly every hand in the room went up when he asked whether they would give AI up entirely. TIMESTAMPS - For Humanity #93 0:00 - Welcome to For Humanity 0:24 - Welcoming Jim VandeHei 0:39 - Reacting to the Coxon resignation 1:04 - Why this whistleblower broke through 3:06 - What a difference a week makes 5:00 - Congress gripped by AI panic 5:32 - How much of DC understands AI 6:03 - Sanders, Trump, and "let it rip" 8:23 - Why VandeHei doubts "pump and dump" 9:40 - What lab leaders said before Coxon 10:12 - Has John made his own call yet 10:33 - Being a self-described AI lab rat 12:29 - An accountability deal for data centers 14:02 - JD Vance's AI skepticism 15:19 - The Civil War and nuclear analogy 16:12 - Praising Axios' AI coverage 16:44 - John's own P(doom) origin story 18:05 - Does AI kill VandeHei personally 20:56 - Could superintelligence be banned 21:12 - Why that feels unachievable today 23:38 - Why insiders got spooked this month 24:43 - The one question for Sam and Dario 26:24 - Interviewing lab CEOs on stage 29:51 - Could curing cancer change minds 33:47 - How AI helped diagnose his wife 37:19 - Tech CEOs booed at graduation 38:00 - New York City's K-8 AI ban 40:22 - What he tells his own kids 42:42 - A question mark wrapped in clouds 44:51 - Believing in the other 80 percent 48:35 - The book Simplify, and AI's role 50:51 - The room that voted to give up AI 53:28 - AI as a complexity machine 55:16 - Would he throw AI in the river 55:52 - Journalism's blind spot on AI risk 59:09 - A data center trip in Louisiana They discuss: Why VandeHei says the days after Jacob Coxon's resignation brought "more activity from lawmakers" than he has seen since AI became a mainstream concern Why he estimates only 2 to 5 percent of Congress understands the technology well, and why he doubts this week produces real legislation The independent review board and "kill switch" VandeHei says the industry has never built, and how lab leaders have responded when he has raised it with them Dario Amodei's own public estimate of a 10 to 25 percent chance AI development "ends very, very badly," and VandeHei's account of Amodei's reasoning for building it anyway Why VandeHei's own odds of AI causing him serious harm are lower than John's, and the historical comparisons he draws on What VandeHei says AI has done for his family's health, and where he thinks the technology's clearest near-term benefits are A moment from an advertising panel where VandeHei says he was not surprised nearly every hand in the room went up when asked about giving up AI entirely VandeHei's new book "Simplify," and his argument that AI often makes organizations more complicated rather than less About the guest: Jim VandeHei is co-founder and CEO of Axios and co-founder of Politico. He is co-author of the new book "Simplify: Do 50% More and 50% Less." About the host: John Sherman hosts For Humanity and leads Guard Rail Now, working to make AI extinction risk a kitchen table conversation on every street. Subscribe to The AI Risk Network for new episodes: @TheAIRiskNetwork Links: Support our work: https://www.every.org/guardrailnow Substack: https://substack.com/@theairisknetwork X: https://x.com/AIRiskNetwork Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/theairisknetwork/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@the.airisknetwork Join the conversation: What would it take for an independent body to actually get built before the next incident Drop your thoughts below in the comments! #AISafety #AIRisk #ForHumanity #Axios #AIRegulation #Congress #JimVandeHei #ArtificialIntelligence

Support Guard Rail Now: https://www.every.org/guardrailnow

Two days after an Anthropic researcher's resignation post went viral, Axios co-founder Jim VandeHei joins John Sherman to talk about what changed in Washington, and what he says still has not been built. VandeHei explains why he doubts this week's burst of congressional attention turns into real legislation, describes the independent review board and "kill switch" he thinks the industry still lacks, and tells John why his own odds of AI causing serious harm are lower than his host's.

They also get into VandeHei's new book "Simplify," what AI has done for his family, AI in schools, and a moment from an advertising industry panel where nearly every hand in the room went up when he asked whether they would give AI up entirely.

TIMESTAMPS – For Humanity #93

0:00 – Welcome to For Humanity
0:24 – Welcoming Jim VandeHei
0:39 – Reacting to the Coxon resignation
1:04 – Why this whistleblower broke through
3:06 – What a difference a week makes
5:00 – Congress gripped by AI panic
5:32 – How much of DC understands AI
6:03 – Sanders, Trump, and "let it rip"
8:23 – Why VandeHei doubts "pump and dump"
9:40 – What lab leaders said before Coxon
10:12 – Has John made his own call yet
10:33 – Being a self-described AI lab rat
12:29 – An accountability deal for data centers
14:02 – JD Vance's AI skepticism
15:19 – The Civil War and nuclear analogy
16:12 – Praising Axios' AI coverage
16:44 – John's own P(doom) origin story
18:05 – Does AI kill VandeHei personally
20:56 – Could superintelligence be banned
21:12 – Why that feels unachievable today
23:38 – Why insiders got spooked this month
24:43 – The one question for Sam and Dario
26:24 – Interviewing lab CEOs on stage
29:51 – Could curing cancer change minds
33:47 – How AI helped diagnose his wife
37:19 – Tech CEOs booed at graduation
38:00 – New York City's K-8 AI ban
40:22 – What he tells his own kids
42:42 – A question mark wrapped in clouds
44:51 – Believing in the other 80 percent
48:35 – The book Simplify, and AI's role
50:51 – The room that voted to give up AI
53:28 – AI as a complexity machine
55:16 – Would he throw AI in the river
55:52 – Journalism's blind spot on AI risk
59:09 – A data center trip in Louisiana

They discuss:

Why VandeHei says the days after Jacob Coxon's resignation brought "more activity from lawmakers" than he has seen since AI became a mainstream concern
Why he estimates only 2 to 5 percent of Congress understands the technology well, and why he doubts this week produces real legislation
The independent review board and "kill switch" VandeHei says the industry has never built, and how lab leaders have responded when he has raised it with them
Dario Amodei's own public estimate of a 10 to 25 percent chance AI development "ends very, very badly," and VandeHei's account of Amodei's reasoning for building it anyway
Why VandeHei's own odds of AI causing him serious harm are lower than John's, and the historical comparisons he draws on
What VandeHei says AI has done for his family's health, and where he thinks the technology's clearest near-term benefits are
A moment from an advertising panel where VandeHei says he was not surprised nearly every hand in the room went up when asked about giving up AI entirely
VandeHei's new book "Simplify," and his argument that AI often makes organizations more complicated rather than less

About the guest: Jim VandeHei is co-founder and CEO of Axios and co-founder of Politico. He is co-author of the new book "Simplify: Do 50% More and 50% Less."

About the host: John Sherman hosts For Humanity and leads Guard Rail Now, working to make AI extinction risk a kitchen table conversation on every street.

Subscribe to The AI Risk Network for new episodes: @TheAIRiskNetwork

Links: Support our work: https://www.every.org/guardrailnow Substack: https://substack.com/@theairisknetwork X: https://x.com/AIRiskNetwork Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/theairisknetwork/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@the.airisknetwork

Join the conversation:

What would it take for an independent body to actually get built before the next incident Drop your thoughts below in the comments!

#AISafety #AIRisk #ForHumanity #Axios #AIRegulation #Congress #JimVandeHei #ArtificialIntelligence


91


32

YouTube Video VVVURXBJZWliOTJUdUtvMmNTczR3ZzhBLmRQcnJnOC1Cd19j



The AI Kill Switch Nobody Has Built | For Humanity #93


The AI Risk Network | AI Safety


September 15, 2026 4:24 pm



3


0

YouTube Video VVVURXBJZWliOTJUdUtvMmNTczR3ZzhBLkl1X0l2YWVMZDlV



Anthropic: "Jacob Is Correct"


The AI Risk Network | AI Safety


September 15, 2026 11:45 am




Subscribe

Services

What We Offer

Establish a striking online presence, a better visual identity, or elevate your brand through social media marketing.

Service 1

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Pellentesque mi nibh, tempus sed sagittis vel, dictum eu velit.

Service 2

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Pellentesque mi nibh, tempus sed sagittis vel, dictum eu velit.

Service 3

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Pellentesque mi nibh, tempus sed sagittis vel, dictum eu velit.

Tailored Solutions for Your Unique Vision

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec congue lorem ut volutpat efficitur. Fusce justo magna, condimentum nec elementum sed, sollicitudin vitae enim. Vivamus sit amet metus porttitor, rhoncus nibh et, venenatis turpis. Etiam lobortis semper ante, quis luctus lacus tincidunt vel.

Get Started Today →
Learn More

Professional Expertise That Drives Success

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec congue lorem ut volutpat efficitur. Fusce justo magna, condimentum nec elementum sed, sollicitudin vitae enim. Vivamus sit amet metus porttitor, rhoncus nibh et, venenatis turpis. Etiam lobortis semper ante, quis luctus lacus tincidunt vel.

Client Cases

We help brands

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit,
donec congue lorem ut volutpat efficitur.

We boosted online soft drink sales for this brand

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec congue lorem ut volutpat efficitur. Fusce justo magna, condimentum nec elementum sed, sollicitudin vitae enim. Vivamus sit amet metus porttitor, rhoncus nibh et, venenatis turpis. Etiam lobortis semper ante, quis luctus lacus tincidunt vel.

We helped a clothing brand with their new market launch

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec congue lorem ut volutpat efficitur. Fusce justo magna, condimentum nec elementum sed, sollicitudin vitae enim. Vivamus sit amet metus porttitor, rhoncus nibh et, venenatis turpis. Etiam lobortis semper ante, quis luctus lacus tincidunt vel.

We helped reinventing motorcycle riding apparel

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec congue lorem ut volutpat efficitur. Fusce justo magna, condimentum nec elementum sed, sollicitudin vitae enim. Vivamus sit amet metus porttitor, rhoncus nibh et, venenatis turpis. Etiam lobortis semper ante, quis luctus lacus tincidunt vel.

Blog

Popular Articles

  • Test

    •

    admin

  • Blog Post Title

    •

    What goes into a blog post? Helpful, industry-specific content that: 1) gives readers a useful takeaway, and 2) shows you’re an industry expert. Use your company’s blog posts to opine on current industry topics, humanize your company, and show how your products and services can help people.

Ignite your brand journey

Ready to revolutionize your brand?

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec congue lorem ut volutpat efficitur. Fusce justo magna, condimentum nec elementum sed, sollicitudin vitae enim.

About Us
Contact Us